Traces of the Trinity: A First Glimpse

The Trinity leaves fingerprints on every inch of creation. 
The world is crafted to say something true about its Creator.

Celtic Trinity Knot Symbol

I encourage you to read as you listen.  There are footnotes along the way defining unfamiliar words and providing some context for those who want to go a little deeper. (just click the footnote number.)

Traces of the Trinity Podcast – Intro

***

Hey there — welcome to the podcast about Traces of the Trinity, a podcast series that explores a question you might not have asked, but once you do, you might not see the world the same way again:

What if the world itself carries hints — echoes — of the Triune God?

A wise man once said that “Godly speculation can have an edifying function.” That’s a line from John Frame,1Ph.D. Yale University and it’s how Peter Leithart2Ph.D., University of Cambridge kicks off his book Traces of the Trinity.

Peter Leithart – Ph.D. University of Cambridge

So today, we’re going to dip our toes into that idea and see where it might take us.

+++

Picture this: you glance around your room. Maybe you’re driving. Maybe you’re washing dishes. There’s the outside world — stuff, things, people. And then there’s you — thinking, feeling, observing.

Modern people — thanks in part to an anxious Frenchman named René Descartes3René Descartes (1596–1650) was a French philosopher, mathematician, and scientist widely regarded as the father of modern philosophy. Seeking certainty in knowledge, he developed the method of systematic doubt, famously concluding “Cogito, ergo sum” (“I think, therefore I am”) as an indubitable foundation for philosophy. Descartes made major contributions to mathematics, including the creation of analytic geometry, which linked algebra and geometry. In metaphysics, he argued formind–body dualism, distinguishing between thinking substance (res cogitans) and extended substance (res extensa). His most influential works include Discourse on the Method, Meditations on First Philosophy, and Principles of Philosophy. Descartes’ thought profoundly shaped modern philosophy, science, and rationalism. — got used to slicing reality into these neat categories: me vs. world, inside vs. outside, mind vs. matter. Descartes wanted to discover the thing that was indubitably certain, and build from there, so he doubted everything he could see, smell, touch (because those could be illusions, right?) — but he couldn’t doubt that he was doing the doubting.

Cogito, ergo sum. I think, therefore I am. (I really exist!)   And so, following Descartes’ lead, modernity learned to trust the “thinking thing” inside — and eye everything else as suspicious, out there.

But here’s where Leithart says — hold on a second. Is that really how we live?

You are not just an observer floating above the world. You have a body. Try ignoring it for a day. Stub your toe. Bite your tongue. Watch how fast your “inner self” realizes it’s not floating anywhere.

Even more, you need the world to get inside you — literally. You’re breathing air from outside. Drinking water. Eating food that was once something else entirely. If you close yourself off from the world, you don’t become more spiritual — you die.

+++

So here’s where this gets interesting. Leithart takes this ordinary truth — that the world gets into us, and we get into it — and invites us to see it through the lens of the Trinity.

He uses an old theological word you may not have heard: perichoresis — a fancy Greek term that means mutual indwelling. In the Christian tradition, it describes how the Father, Son, and Spirit dwell in each other completely, without losing who they are.

The Father is in the Son, the Son in the Father, and both in the Spirit.4Scripture addresses this theme of mutual indwelling most directly in John’s Gospel, where Jesus articulates the reciprocal relationship between himself and the Father.

Jesus explicitly states that he exists within the Father while the Father simultaneously exists within him (John 14:10–11), a declaration he repeats for emphasis. He grounds this claim in the Father’s active presence—the Father dwelling within him performs the works Jesus accomplishes (John 14:10–11). This mutual indwelling serves as evidence of their unity, inviting belief through the works themselves (John 10:38).

The relationship extends beyond the Father and Son to encompass believers and the Spirit. Jesus promises that his followers will come to understand a threefold union: he dwells in the Father, they dwell in him, and he dwells in them (John 14:20). This pattern of mutual presence becomes a model for Christian experience. In his prayer to the Father, Jesus envisions believers united with both the Father and Son, just as the Father and Son are united with each other (John 17:21).

Regarding the Spirit specifically, Jesus promises the Holy Spirit as a Helper who will dwell with believers and ultimately be within them (John 14:16–17). While the scriptures don’t explicitly state all three persons simultaneously indwelling one another in a single passage, the Johannine material establishes the foundational theology: the Father and Son mutually indwell each other, believers indwell both through faith, and the Spirit indwells believers. Together, these passages construct a picture of trinitarian communion that extends from the Godhead into the church.

It’s a swirl, a dance, a mutual embrace.  Not fusion — not confusion — but an eternal giving and receiving.

And here’s the bold move: what if this pattern is not just tucked away in theology textbooks — but stitched into creation itself? What if the world hums with hints of this divine choreography?

+++

Leithart admits up front — this isn’t a new idea. Theologians from Augustine5Saint Augustine of Hippo (354–430) was a Christian theologian, philosopher, and bishop of Hippo in North Africa, and one of the most influential figures in Western Christianity. After a restless youth, he converted to Christianity in 386 under the influence of St. Ambrose. His writings shaped Christian doctrine on grace, sin, free will, and the Trinity. Augustine’s most famous works include Confessions, a spiritual autobiography; The City of God, a vision of history shaped by the love of God; and On the Trinity. Blending classical philosophy with biblical faith, Augustine profoundly influenced medieval theology, the Protestant Reformers, and Western thought as a whole. to the Cappadocians6The Cappadocians, or Cappadocian Fathers, were three influential 4th-century Christian theologians from Cappadocia (in modern Turkey): Basil the Great, Gregory of Nazianzus, and Gregory of Nyssa. They played a crucial role in defending and clarifying Trinitarian doctrine, especially the distinction between one essence (ousia) and three persons (hypostaseis), helping to establish Nicene orthodoxy against Arianism. Their work shaped Christian theology, worship, and monasticism, and remains foundational in both Eastern Orthodox and Western Christian traditions. before him, loved to talk about the vestigia Trinitatis — the “traces” or footprints of the Trinity. Over the centuries, the tradition fell out of fashion. But Leithart wants to revive it — not to rewrite doctrine, but to stretch our imaginations.

He’s not trying to prove the Trinity from nature — he’s starting with the revealed truth that the Triune God made the world — and saying: shouldn’t we expect the fingerprints to be there? Shouldn’t we expect echoes and clues, spirals and coils, hints and whorls?

+++

So that’s where this little podcast adventure begins. It’s not about nailing down every analogy or diagramming the divine. It’s about training ourselves to look closer, to wonder more deeply. To believe that when you walk outside — when you share a meal — when you hug someone you love — the pattern of giving and receiving, the shape of mutual indwelling, might just be whispering the life of the Trinity.

And maybe you’ve wondered about this too — is the world just cold, hard matter? Or is it, as Leithart suggests, alive with traces of the Triune life that made it?

+++

So if you only remember one thing today, let it be this: You are not a ghost trapped in a machine. You are a body and a soul, part of a world that moves in and through you — and through it, you might just catch the faintest echo of Father, Son, and Spirit at play.

Next time, we’ll move from the preface to the world right in front of us — the desk, the coffee mug, the window, and the old recliner waiting for that afternoon nap.

We’ll keep asking: What if nothing is quite as separate as we thought? What if we’re all caught up in a divine dance?

Until then, take a look around. Listen for the whispers. And maybe — just maybe — you’ll start spotting traces of the Trinity, too.

The Trinity leaves fingerprints on every inch of creation.

+++

1: Traces of the Trinity: Outside In, Inside Out.

I welcome any questions or comments. [Don’t worry, your personal info will not be given to anyone.]

When Courts Are Asked to Forget Reality

The Supreme Court: By Jesse Collins – CC 3.0

In a healthy constitutional republic, courts interpret laws; they do not redefine reality. Judges are charged with reading legal texts, not resolving questions of basic human biology that ordinary citizens have understood for centuries. Yet our cultural moment has produced an inversion: courts are increasingly asked to decide whether obvious truths about sex still count as truths at all.

That tension was on full display during yesterday’s Supreme Court arguments challenging state laws in West Virginia and Idaho that reserve girls’ and women’s sports for girls and women. These cases are not really about athletics. They are about whether the law must affirm a fiction—namely, that biological sex is either unknowable or irrelevant.

Why Female Sports Exist at All

Sex-segregated sports exist for a reason. Biological differences between males and females are real, measurable, and consequential—especially in competitive athletics, where strength, speed, and endurance matter not only for fairness but also for safety.

Female sports were created precisely because competing against males would disadvantage women and girls. To claim that excluding males from female sports is discriminatory misses the point entirely. The distinction is not arbitrary; it is grounded in biology.

That is why these cases almost always involve males seeking access to female sports rather than the reverse. Males who identify as female are not barred from sports altogether. They are barred from competing as females.

Sex Discrimination—or Biological Reality?

The challengers argue that laws preserving female-only sports constitute unlawful sex discrimination under the Equal Protection Clause and Title IX. But this argument collapses on contact with reality.

Sex-based distinctions are not inherently unjust. The law has long recognized that some forms of sex discrimination are legitimate when they reflect real biological differences rather than irrational prejudice. This is why sex-based classifications receive less stringent judicial scrutiny than race-based ones. Biology is not bigotry.

Female-only sports discriminate on the basis of sex by design—and rightly so.

The Question That Ends the Debate

During oral arguments, Justice Alito asked the question that cuts through all the legal gymnastics: What does “sex” mean for purposes of equal protection and federal civil rights law? How can courts determine whether discrimination has occurred if they cannot define the category at issue?

The response was astonishing. The challengers conceded that they had no definition. Sex, we were told, has no fixed legal meaning.

That should have ended the case.

When Congress prohibited discrimination “on the basis of sex,” it used a word with a clear, public meaning—one rooted in biology and universally understood when those laws were enacted. If that definition governs, laws protecting female sports are plainly lawful. If federal law is silent, then states are entitled to define sex reasonably for themselves. Either way, a biological definition cannot violate federal law.

The Absurd Alternative

The only alternative offered is worse: a system in which schools must police hormone levels, medical histories, and bodily alterations to determine who qualifies as female enough to compete. Such a regime would be invasive, unworkable, and deeply unjust—especially to girls.

The truth is neither complicated nor cruel. Boys are not girls. Men are not women. A legal system that cannot say so is not advancing equality; it is abandoning reality.


Companion Post

+++

Celebrate God’s Good Creation

The Promise of Disembodiment? A Big Lie! – Podcast

Image of ghost, produced by double exposure. 1899.

[This podcast is for all my Christian brothers and sisters. Especially those who attend churches that have been seduced by gender ideology.]


Welcome back to the Podcast. I’m glad you’re here with me today. We’re tackling a big cultural question—the growing obsession with what can be called the promise of disembodiment. That’s the idea that our bodies don’t matter, that they’re just clay to be reshaped, husks to be discarded, or even obstacles to the “real” self.

And here’s the spoiler: it’s a lie. A very old lie dressed up in new clothes.

Today, I want to walk with you through this lie, why it’s so appealing, and why the Christian vision of the body offers a much more beautiful, hopeful truth.


Naming the Lie

The cultural signs are everywhere. Abortion framed as a right to bodily “autonomy.” Gender ideology claiming male and female are optional. Assisted suicide presented as dignity. Even futuristic fantasies of uploading our minds into machines. (Yeah, there are some technologists out there that are presenting that as a possibility.)

All of these share the same root assumption: the body doesn’t matter.

Liel Leibovitz, writing recently in First Things, puts it bluntly:

“Those of us who know that we were created in God’s image have no choice but to acknowledge our bodies, those awkward earthly vessels that matter and cannot be manipulated as if they were raw material for our disembodied wills.”

That’s exactly it. Either the body is a gift with meaning—or it’s just raw material, something to use, discard, or redefine.

And when we lose the sense of the sacredness of the body, Leibovitz warns,

“Take away this belief in the sacred character of the body and it becomes not a temple but a speed bump.”

A speed bump. Something in the way. Something to get past. That’s the lie we’re facing.


Why the Lie Is Attractive

Let’s be honest—this lie is appealing because it promises freedom. If my body doesn’t matter, then I can do whatever I want with it. I can erase biological sex. I can evade the consequences of sex. I can even reject life itself if it doesn’t feel worth living.

But this so-called freedom is actually a prison. Leibovitz writes:

“When you do away with the sanctity of the body, you invite tyranny, because you are no longer bound to acknowledge what is real, only what is willed.”

If all that matters is my will, then whoever has the strongest will gets to impose their version of “reality.” And that’s not freedom—that’s bondage.


The Christian Response

Here’s where Christianity gives us something radically different.

The very first chapter of the Bible declares:

“So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them” (Gen. 1:27).

Jesus himself reaffirms this in Matthew 19:4: “Have you not read that he who created them from the beginning made them male and female?”

The Apostle Paul drives it home: “Do you not know that your bodies are temples of the Holy Spirit, who is in you…? You are not your own; you were bought at a price. Therefore honor God with your bodies” (1 Cor. 6:19–20).

The Christian response to the lie of disembodiment is simple but profound: your body matters. It’s not a mistake. It’s not an accident. It’s not raw clay for you to remake. It is God’s creation, God’s gift, and God’s temple.


Why This Matters Today

This isn’t just theory. It affects the way we live right now.

  • Children are told they can “change” their sex.
  • The elderly are told their lives are no longer worth living.
  • The unborn are treated as disposable tissue.
  • And technology dangles the fantasy of living without flesh at all.

But Christians know better. As Leibovitz reminds us:

“The rejection of the body is the rejection of limits, and the rejection of limits is the rejection of responsibility. And where responsibility vanishes, so does love.”

That’s the key. Love requires limits. Love requires responsibility. Love requires embodiment.

Think about it: Christ didn’t love us from afar. He took on flesh. He bore our sins in his body. He rose bodily from the grave. Real love shows up in the flesh.

It is no good to say: “Be warmed, be filled, go in peace” to the poor person (James 2:15-16). You gotta give them a cloak. You gotta give them food. That’s what it means to love your neighbor.


The True Promise

So what’s the alternative to the lie?

It’s not escape. It’s not disembodiment. It’s resurrection.

The gospel promises that these very bodies—frail, weak, mortal—will be redeemed. Paul writes in Romans 8:23 that we await “the redemption of our bodies.” Christ himself is the guarantee, the firstfruits of the resurrection.

So, no, we don’t hope for disembodiment. We don’t hope for escape. We hope for restoration, fulfillment, resurrection glory.


Friends, the promise of disembodiment is a lie. It sounds like freedom, but it ends in alienation and death. The true promise is this: your body matters. God made it, Christ redeemed it, and the Spirit indwells it.

So let’s live that truth with courage and joy. Let’s reject the lie. And let’s proclaim to the world: our hope is not to leave the body behind—but to rise with it, made new, forever.


Thanks for joining me today on the Podcast. Until next time, remember—your body is a temple, and your destiny is resurrection.

+++

Celebrate God’s Good Creation