“The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom unanimously ruled Wednesday that a woman is someone born biologically female, a move that now excludes transgender women from the legal definition of a woman.
Trans women can be excluded from some single-sex spaces and groups under the U.K. Equality Act, the five judges of the top court ruled. These spaces and groups include changing rooms, homeless shelters, swimming areas and medical or counseling services provided only to women.”
“The ruling means that even a transgender person with a certificate that recognizes them as female should not be considered a woman for equality purposes.”
I can’t believe we’ve come to this point in the Western world, that a ruling like this is required. But it is welcomed nonetheless. Stop the insanity! And while we are at it, stop the mutilation and sterilization of our confused youth.
During a recent Colorado House Judiciary Committee hearing on HB25-1312—a bill addressing legal protections for transgender individuals—Democratic State Representative Yara Zokaie sparked controversy by likening concerned parent groups to hate organizations. In response to Republican State Representative Jarvis Caldwell’s inquiry about stakeholder engagement, Zokaie stated, “A well-stakeholdered bill does not need to be discussed with hate groups… we don’t ask someone passing civil rights legislation to go ask the KKK their opinion.”
HB25-1312 proposes that courts consider actions such as “deadnaming” (using a transgender person’s former name) and “misgendering” as forms of “coercive control” in child custody cases. The bill successfully passed the committee with a 7-4 vote and is now advancing to the Assembly for further consideration.
Representative Caldwell expressed deep concern over Zokaie’s remarks, emphasizing that labeling parents as hate groups is “reckless” and that parents advocating for their children’s education and rights should be respected, not vilified.
If enacted, Colorado would become the first state to pass such legislation. A similar bill in California was vetoed by Governor Gavin Newsom in 2023.
In 2016 a documentary revealed a previously little-known global subculture of people living double lives as “human pups”, wearing elaborate dog suits and engaging in “human puppy play” with their handlers.
I wish I could say this is just one big publicity gag. But, I can’t.
You can read details about the subculture at this news story in The Guardian (UK). A trailer of the documentary is embedded in the story. Check it out.
***
Here are two quotes from the story that should sound familiar to those who’ve been reading this blog or following the logic of the Gender Identity movement.
Kaz, another pup, argues that for some, being a puppy isn’t just a fun mask to try on – it’s how they identify; it’s who they are.
Whether we see it as a kink, an identity, a reaction to an early experience, a form of escapism or a fetish, the main thing, says Tom, is that we see it at all; that we know it’s there and accept it. “It feels like you can be gay, straight, bisexual, trans and be accepted,” he says. “All I want is for the pup community to be accepted in the same way. We’re not trying to cause grief to the public, or cause grief to relationships. We’re just the same as any other person on the high street.”
Louis Hersent – Pandora Reclining in a Wooded Landscape – Public Domain
This is the Pandora’s Box we’ve opened up. Trans-activists and Gender Identity Ideologues often accuse critics like me of supporting biological determinism. The “pups” in this story would accuse me of species determinism.
Do we want to live in this world? Again it cannot be a question of loving confused people. That’s a given. These folk need therapy, prayer and plenty of hugs. Not pats on the head, or belly rubs.
***
If you are still interested, here’s an interview of one of the documentary “puppy” stars. When you finish please read my reflections below.
***
For most people sex becomes visible at birth, or via ultrasound, whichever comes first. We are born anatomically, chromosomally, male or female. But even before that, mature reproductive cells called gametes, male sperm & female eggs, determine biological sex. When the sperm fertilizes an egg at conception, the baby will be either a male or female human. At around seven weeks, if the embryo is male, the testes secretes testosterone, masculinizing the brain, if the embryo is female, this process does not occur.
Sex is not “assigned” at birth. [See my rebuttal of that fiction here.] This rhetorical move by Transgender activists (widely used and accepted) suggests that your sex may be reassigned, surgically or otherwise, even though your DNA encodes every cell in your body as either male or female. Against all reason in my view, some think reassignment possible. Even some medical professionals, and well known medical associations have gone along with this fiction.
I blogged about the politicization of the medical profession here and here.
We are told by many in this debate that the body is essentially irrelevant, which leaves us with the more relevant characteristics of mind, will, imagination, desire, emotions, all components of our inner life. Outer life, visible life, the life of the five senses, biological life, DNA encoded life, are deemed insufficiently relevant. Only what we think, what we desire, really matters.
Thus,inner conviction trumps biology, and thereby divorces our humanity, splitting our mind-body unity into two disconnected parts, resulting in mind-body alienation.
Okay. If that split is one that ought to be recognized by society, what about these bloaks in the UK who think they are dogs? Are there any limits to psychological preference and the convictions of the inner life? If you think you are a bird and jump off the Golden Gate Bridge, will you fly?
If psychology trumps biology, then when you say you are a dog, aren’t you indisputably a dog? And shouldn’t public policy accommodate that belief? What’s to keep an activist from shouting “a trans pup is a real pup!” If there are zero biological boundaries to consider, why not? If there can be gender fluidity, why not species fluidity? Logically, what’s the difference?
***
How is this not mental confusion screaming out for therapy and prayer? How can we possibly affirm these mental disorders? If we disregard chromosomal sex, (males are born with XY chromosomes, females have XX chromosomes,) if we deny what male and female gametes have “lovingly” produced why can’t someone deny their species genetic markers? If we disregard the breasts, uterus and ovaries, the penis and testicles, the unmistakeable reproductive parts of males and females, what’s to stop someone from disregarding their humanity and unfortunate lack of paws?
If you accept the premise that it is only what we think, feel, desire or will that truly and fully identifies us, even though every DNA informed cell in the body says otherwise, how can you deny Transpups the same legal recognition as those who are Transgender or any other identity they wish to claim? Isn’t this something we must accept to qualify as an inclusive society?
I’ll be the first to admit that biological facts are not everything. I’m not a philosophical materialist. But those facts are not nothing. For I believe our bodies are gifts from God, in partnership with our parentage, of course. If we disregard our bodies don’t we disregard our God-given design? And isn’t that delusional?
***
I’m a Classic Christian and regard Gender Ideology as anti-creational to the core. This blog is about “God’s Good Creation.” That’s why I’m writing about Gender Ideology. And “speaking up” as I’m confident Jesus would.
"Have you not read that the one who made them at the beginning 'made them male and female.'" [Matt 19:4]
