Category: Gender Science

This is a follow up post to the two posts recently made about the False Assumptions of current gender science practices. Leor Sapir’s thread below is well worth your time.

🚨🚨🚨 IMPORTANT UPDATE 🚨🚨🚨

A new peer-reviewed article shows the fatal weaknesses of the Dutch studies and their inapplicability to current pediatric gender care.

I will be writing about this issue in depth, but here's a very quick 🧵https://t.co/rzpsNUPPjt

— Leor Sapir (@LeorSapir) January 4, 2023

+++

What Are We Doing To Our Children?

Place this in the Institutional Capture Column. The ABFM asked the following question in its certification exam:

A 13-year-old who was assigned female at birth has been diagnosed with gender dysphoria. His parents fully support their child and affirm his gender as male. On examination the patient has a sexual maturity rating of Tanner stage 3.

Which one of the following steps would be appropriate for optimal support and therapy for this patient?

A follower sent me this from the certification exam for the American Board of Family Medicine. It asks how the professional should respond to a child with gender dysphoria. If you choose delaying medical transitioning, that is incorrect. The correct answer is puberty blockers. pic.twitter.com/XwNFrMNzA5

— Andy Ngô 🏳️‍🌈 (@MrAndyNgo) January 12, 2023

---

Companion Posts

False Assumptions Behind Youth Gender Transitions

Institutional Capture – Podcast

+++

Institutional Capture