The U.S. Department of Education just ruled that the University of Pennsylvania violated Title IX — the landmark civil rights law that’s supposed to ensure equal opportunities for women in education and athletics.
Why? Because Penn allowed Lia Thomas, a male athlete who identifies as female, to compete on the women’s swim team. And according to the federal government’s own Office for Civil Rights (OCR), that decision denied actual women their legal rights under Title IX.
This is not a small thing. Title IX was put in place to make sure girls and women had the same opportunities as men in schools — especially in sports. For decades, it has leveled the playing field. But this case is a stark reminder that fairness is under attack, and female athletes are paying the price.
A Line in the Sand
Lia Thomas competed for three years on Penn’s men’s swim team, without much distinction. Then, after a gender transition, Thomas joined the women’s team — and started dominating. It was an immediate, obvious, and predictable outcome. Male bodies, even post-transition, retain biological advantages: greater lung capacity, muscle mass, bone density, and more. That’s just physiology. It doesn’t make someone a bad person — but it does make it unfair.
The OCR’s ruling affirms what so many people have been saying for years but have been afraid to say out loud: letting males compete in female sports isn’t inclusive — it’s unjust.
What Did the Government Find?
The Trump administration’s own Department of Education found that Penn’s actions violated Title IX by denying women “equal athletic opportunity” and “equal access to athletic benefits.” In plain English: women lost out. Whether it was roster spots, scholarships, facilities, or competitive success — they were pushed aside.
It took a federal investigation to confirm what every swimmer on that pool deck already knew.
What Happens Next?
Penn has been told to fix the mess. That means:
- Acknowledging the violation.
- Revisiting records and awards.
- Issuing a public apology to the female athletes who were wronged.
- Making sure it doesn’t happen again.
If the university doesn’t comply? The federal government could pull funding or take further legal action. The Trump administration has suspended approximately $175 million in federal funding to Penn and gave the university ten days to comply with a proposed resolution agreement. This agreement includes actions such as revoking Thomas’s Division I awards and issuing a public apology to affected female athletes.
This Is Bigger Than One School
This isn’t just about Penn. It’s about a nationwide trend where the rights of female athletes are being sacrificed on the altar of ideology. We’re told that inclusion means erasing the biological distinctions that make women’s sports necessary in the first place. That’s not inclusion — it’s erasure.
And here’s the thing: it’s not ‘transphobic’ to say women deserve a fair shot. It’s not hate to say that biology matters in sports. It’s just reality. If we can’t say that, then we’ve officially left the realm of reason.
Time to Reclaim Title IX
This case is a wake-up call. Title IX was designed to protect women — not to accommodate male athletes who identify as female. We don’t need to rewrite civil rights law. We need to enforce it.
So, hats off to the brave women who stood up and spoke out. And credit to the Office for Civil Rights for finally doing the right thing.
Now it’s time for schools across the country to pay attention. Because fairness in women’s sports isn’t negotiable — it’s the whole point.
Do we have eyes to see? And minds and hearts to know?
+++
Stay Human